tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5967062019248947104.post2958395540705886441..comments2023-11-05T20:20:19.930+08:00Comments on Joe Chan經濟解釋: 代母合法化 「人類」寵物現?Joe Chanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17541754707269883675noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5967062019248947104.post-86338287641778869112010-11-06T06:28:36.993+08:002010-11-06T06:28:36.993+08:00I don't see why a selfish woman (as asserted b...I don't see why a selfish woman (as asserted by economists) would suffer the pain of child-bearing as well as giving away her own child (as the law asserts) for nothing. Can the so-called ultruistic surrogacy be really not commercial? How do economists determine if something is commercial?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com